Lucera vs Plenitude
A detailed head-to-head comparison covering rates, typical bills, pros & cons, and features to help you decide which is better for your home.
Our Verdict
Overall Winner: Lowest Typical Bill
For a typical Spanish household (3.6kW Potencia, 300kWh monthly usage), Plenitude is the cheaper option. Their Fácil Luz tariff results in an estimated monthly bill of €66.18 (including taxes). This compares to Lucera's best option (Tarifa Estable de Luz) at €72.94 per month.
* Assumption: 3.6 kW contracted power, 300 kWh monthly usage (20% peak, 30% flat, 50% off-peak), including 21% IVA, 5.11% Electricity Tax, and ~€1 meter rental.
Best Flat Rate
Plenitude wins here. Their flat rate is 0.097296 €/kWh compared to Lucera's 0.153 €/kWh.
Best Time-of-Use Rate
Neither provider currently offers a fixed time-of-use rate.
Scorecard Comparison
| Metric (1-10) | Lucera | Plenitude |
|---|---|---|
| Price Competitiveness | 9 | 8 |
| Solar Suitability | 6 | 7 |
| EV Suitability | 5 | 6 |
| Simplicity | 9 | 8 |
| Customer Service | 9 | 7 |
| Transparency | 10 | 8 |
Full Head-to-Head Comparison
Lucera
Pros
- Totale transparantie (geen marge op verbruik)
- 100% Gecertificeerde groene energie
- Geen minimale looptijd
- Hoge kwaliteit app en advies
Cons
- Maandelijkse vergoeding geldt ongeacht verbruik
- Prijsgarantie is korter (6 maanden) dan bij sommigen
- Voornamelijk digitale ondersteuning
Available Tariffs
Tarifa Estable de Luz
Plenitude
Pros
- 100% Gecertificeerde groene energie
- Eenvoudige, stabiele vaste-prijs tarieven
- Sterke financiële basis via Eni
- Geen vaste looptijd of boetes
Cons
- Traditioneel klantenservicemodel
- Prijzen kunnen hoger zijn dan bij prijsvechters
- Focus ligt sterk op vaste tarieven
Available Tariffs
Fácil Luz
Find the absolute best supplier for your home
Don't rely on typical profiles. Upload your real bill and our AI will calculate exactly which supplier is cheaper for your actual energy usage.
Analyze My Bill Now