Endesa vs Plenitude
A detailed head-to-head comparison covering rates, typical bills, pros & cons, and features to help you decide which is better for your home.
Our Verdict
Overall Winner: Lowest Typical Bill
For a typical Spanish household (3.6kW Potencia, 300kWh monthly usage), Endesa is the cheaper option. Their Endesa Premium ATR tariff results in an estimated monthly bill of €63.93 (including taxes). This compares to Plenitude's best option (Fácil Luz) at €66.18 per month.
* Assumption: 3.6 kW contracted power, 300 kWh monthly usage (20% peak, 30% flat, 50% off-peak), including 21% IVA, 5.11% Electricity Tax, and ~€1 meter rental.
Best Flat Rate
Endesa wins here. Their flat rate is 0.095999 €/kWh compared to Plenitude's 0.097296 €/kWh.
Best Time-of-Use Rate
Endesa is the only provider offering a fixed 3-period time-of-use rate.
Scorecard Comparison
| Metric (1-10) | Endesa | Plenitude |
|---|---|---|
| Price Competitiveness | 6 | 8 |
| Solar Suitability | 6 | 7 |
| EV Suitability | 6 | 6 |
| Simplicity | 5 | 8 |
| Customer Service | 4 | 7 |
| Transparency | 5 | 8 |
Full Head-to-Head Comparison
Endesa
Pros
- Fysiske kontorer over hele Spania
- Svært stabilt selskap
- Konkurransedyktige digitale priser
- Bredt utvalg av hjemmetjenester
Cons
- Kundeservice kan være treg
- Kompleks faktureringsstruktur
- Aggressiv markedsføring
Available Tariffs
One Luz
Endesa Premium ATR
Endesa Solar Plus Virtual Battery
Endesa ATR Fija 24
One Luz 3 Periodos
Conecta Luz
Endesa ATR Fija Premium
Plenitude
Pros
- 100 % sertifisert grønn energi
- Enkle og stabile fastpristariffer
- Sterk finansiell ryggrad via Eni
- Uten bindingstid eller exit-gebyrer
Cons
- Tradisjonell kundeservicemodell
- Prisene kan være høyere enn hos lavprisaktører
- Fokus er tungt på fastpris
Available Tariffs
Fácil Luz
Find the absolute best supplier for your home
Don't rely on typical profiles. Upload your real bill and our AI will calculate exactly which supplier is cheaper for your actual energy usage.
Analyze My Bill Now