HolaLuz vs Lucera
A detailed head-to-head comparison covering rates, typical bills, pros & cons, and features to help you decide which is better for your home.
Our Verdict
Overall Winner: Lowest Typical Bill
For a typical Spanish household (3.6kW Potencia, 300kWh monthly usage), Lucera is the cheaper option. Their Tarifa Estable de Luz tariff results in an estimated monthly bill of €72.94 (including taxes). This compares to HolaLuz's best option (HolaLuz Rate 3) at €77.89 per month.
* Assumption: 3.6 kW contracted power, 300 kWh monthly usage (20% peak, 30% flat, 50% off-peak), including 21% IVA, 5.11% Electricity Tax, and ~€1 meter rental.
Best Flat Rate
HolaLuz wins here. Their flat rate is 0.147 €/kWh compared to Lucera's 0.153 €/kWh.
Best Time-of-Use Rate
HolaLuz is the only provider offering a fixed 3-period time-of-use rate.
Scorecard Comparison
| Metric (1-10) | HolaLuz | Lucera |
|---|---|---|
| Price Competitiveness | 6 | 9 |
| Solar Suitability | 9 | 6 |
| EV Suitability | 6 | 5 |
| Simplicity | 8 | 9 |
| Customer Service | 4 | 9 |
| Transparency | 7 | 10 |
Full Head-to-Head Comparison
HolaLuz
Pros
- Forpliktelse til 100 % grønn energi
- Sterkt fokus på solenergiinnovasjon
- Gjennomsiktige månedlige betalinger
- Etisk forretningsmodell
Cons
- Flate rater kan være dyre for de med lavt forbruk
- Svartiden på kundeservice varierer
- Veldig aggressivt salgsfokus på solceller
Available Tariffs
HolaLuz Classic Rate
HolaLuz Rate 3
Lucera
Pros
- Total gjennomsiktighet (ingen margin på forbruk)
- 100 % sertifisert grønn energi
- Ingen bindingstid
- Høy kvalitet på app og rådgivning
Cons
- Månedsgebyret gjelder uavhengig av forbruk
- Prisgarantien er kortere (6 måneder) enn hos enkelte andre
- Hovedsakelig digital støtte
Available Tariffs
Tarifa Estable de Luz
Find the absolute best supplier for your home
Don't rely on typical profiles. Upload your real bill and our AI will calculate exactly which supplier is cheaper for your actual energy usage.
Analyze My Bill Now