HolaLuz vs Niba
A detailed head-to-head comparison covering rates, typical bills, pros & cons, and features to help you decide which is better for your home.
Our Verdict
Overall Winner: Lowest Typical Bill
For a typical Spanish household (3.6kW Potencia, 300kWh monthly usage), Niba is the cheaper option. Their niba Zen tariff results in an estimated monthly bill of €73.49 (including taxes). This compares to HolaLuz's best option (HolaLuz Classic Rate) at €93.39 per month.
* Assumption: 3.6 kW contracted power, 300 kWh monthly usage (20% peak, 30% flat, 50% off-peak), including 21% IVA, 5.11% Electricity Tax, and ~€1 meter rental.
Best Flat Rate
Niba wins here. Their flat rate is 0.123 €/kWh compared to HolaLuz's 0.154 €/kWh.
Best Time-of-Use Rate
HolaLuz is the only provider offering a fixed 3-period time-of-use rate.
Scorecard Comparison
| Metric (1-10) | HolaLuz | Niba |
|---|---|---|
| Price Competitiveness | 6 | 9 |
| Solar Suitability | 9 | 8 |
| EV Suitability | 6 | 7 |
| Simplicity | 8 | 9 |
| Customer Service | 4 | 8 |
| Transparency | 7 | 9 |
Full Head-to-Head Comparison
HolaLuz
Pros
- Forpliktelse til 100 % grønn energi
- Sterkt fokus på solenergiinnovasjon
- Gjennomsiktige månedlige betalinger
- Etisk forretningsmodell
Cons
- Flate rater kan være dyre for de med lavt forbruk
- Svartiden på kundeservice varierer
- Veldig aggressivt salgsfokus på solceller
Available Tariffs
HolaLuz Classic Rate
HolaLuz Rate 3
Niba
Pros
- Støttet av infrastrukturen og stabiliteten til Iberdrola
- Svært konkurransedyktig flat fastpris ({rate})
- Ingen bindingstid
- 100 % grønn strøm-sertifikater
- Enkel digital registrering og administrasjon
Cons
- Kundeservice er primært digital
- Kortere historikk enn de store tradisjonelle leverandørene
Available Tariffs
niba Zen
niba Flex
niba Solar
Find the absolute best supplier for your home
Don't rely on typical profiles. Upload your real bill and our AI will calculate exactly which supplier is cheaper for your actual energy usage.
Analyze My Bill Now