Lucera vs CHC Energía
A detailed head-to-head comparison covering rates, typical bills, pros & cons, and features to help you decide which is better for your home.
Our Verdict
Overall Winner: Lowest Typical Bill
For a typical Spanish household (3.6kW Potencia, 300kWh monthly usage), Lucera is the cheaper option. Their Tarifa Estable de Luz tariff results in an estimated monthly bill of €72.94 (including taxes). This compares to CHC Energía's best option (Plan Ilumina Promo) at €78.34 per month.
* Assumption: 3.6 kW contracted power, 300 kWh monthly usage (20% peak, 30% flat, 50% off-peak), including 21% IVA, 5.11% Electricity Tax, and ~€1 meter rental.
Best Flat Rate
Lucera wins here. Their flat rate is 0.153 €/kWh compared to CHC Energía's 0.169 €/kWh.
Best Time-of-Use Rate
CHC Energía is the only provider offering a fixed 3-period time-of-use rate.
Scorecard Comparison
| Metric (1-10) | Lucera | CHC Energía |
|---|---|---|
| Price Competitiveness | 9 | 6 |
| Solar Suitability | 6 | 5 |
| EV Suitability | 5 | 6 |
| Simplicity | 9 | 7 |
| Customer Service | 9 | 8 |
| Transparency | 10 | 7 |
Full Head-to-Head Comparison
Lucera
Pros
- Total gjennomsiktighet (ingen margin på forbruk)
- 100 % sertifisert grønn energi
- Ingen bindingstid
- Høy kvalitet på app og rådgivning
Cons
- Månedsgebyret gjelder uavhengig av forbruk
- Prisgarantien er kortere (6 måneder) enn hos enkelte andre
- Hovedsakelig digital støtte
Available Tariffs
Tarifa Estable de Luz
CHC Energía
Pros
- Enormt nettverk av fysiske kontorer
- Personlig lokal kundeservice
- Enkle og stabile fastprisplaner
- Bra for distriktene
Cons
- Digital kundeservice kan være treg
- Varierende tilbakemeldinger på fakturaklarhet
- Færre tekniske app-funksjoner enn hos utfordrerne
Available Tariffs
Plan Ilumina Promo
Plan Vehículo Eléctrico
Plan Ilumina Dúo Promo
Find the absolute best supplier for your home
Don't rely on typical profiles. Upload your real bill and our AI will calculate exactly which supplier is cheaper for your actual energy usage.
Analyze My Bill Now