Gana Energía vs Niba
A detailed head-to-head comparison covering rates, typical bills, pros & cons, and features to help you decide which is better for your home.
Our Verdict
Overall Winner: Lowest Typical Bill
For a typical Spanish household (3.6kW Potencia, 300kWh monthly usage), Gana Energía is the cheaper option. Their Gana Energia Tarifa 3 Tramos tariff results in an estimated monthly bill of €66.34 (including taxes). This compares to Niba's best option (niba Solar) at €69.88 per month.
* Assumption: 3.6 kW contracted power, 300 kWh monthly usage (20% peak, 30% flat, 50% off-peak), including 21% IVA, 5.11% Electricity Tax, and ~€1 meter rental.
Best Flat Rate
Niba wins here. Their flat rate is 0.115 €/kWh compared to Gana Energía's 0.119 €/kWh.
Best Time-of-Use Rate
Gana Energía has cheaper off-peak hours (0.08 €/kWh vs 0.089 €/kWh).
Scorecard Comparison
| Metric (1-10) | Gana Energía | Niba |
|---|---|---|
| Price Competitiveness | 9 | 9 |
| Solar Suitability | 7 | 8 |
| EV Suitability | 6 | 7 |
| Simplicity | 9 | 9 |
| Customer Service | 8 | 8 |
| Transparency | 10 | 9 |
Full Head-to-Head Comparison
Gana Energía
Pros
- Mycket konkurrenskraftiga priser
- Enkel fakturering utan krångel
- 100% förnybar energi
- Ingen bindningstid
Cons
- Begränsade kanaler för kundtjänst
- Inga fysiska kontor
- Appen är väldigt enkel
Available Tariffs
Gana Energia Tarifa Fija 24h
Gana Energia Tarifa 3 Tramos
Niba
Pros
- Med stöd av Iberdrolas infrastruktur och stabilitet
- Mycket konkurrenskraftigt fast pris ({rate})
- Ingen bindningtid
- 100 % grön el-certifikat
- Enkel digital registrering och hantering
Cons
- Kundtjänst är främst digital
- Kortare historik än de stora traditionella elbolagen
Available Tariffs
niba Solar
niba Zen
niba Tres
niba Flex
Find the absolute best supplier for your home
Don't rely on typical profiles. Upload your real bill and our AI will calculate exactly which supplier is cheaper for your actual energy usage.
Analyze My Bill Now