HolaLuz vs Niba
A detailed head-to-head comparison covering rates, typical bills, pros & cons, and features to help you decide which is better for your home.
Our Verdict
Overall Winner: Lowest Typical Bill
For a typical Spanish household (3.6kW Potencia, 300kWh monthly usage), Niba is the cheaper option. Their niba Solar tariff results in an estimated monthly bill of €69.88 (including taxes). This compares to HolaLuz's best option (HolaLuz Rate 3) at €77.89 per month.
* Assumption: 3.6 kW contracted power, 300 kWh monthly usage (20% peak, 30% flat, 50% off-peak), including 21% IVA, 5.11% Electricity Tax, and ~€1 meter rental.
Best Flat Rate
Niba wins here. Their flat rate is 0.115 €/kWh compared to HolaLuz's 0.147 €/kWh.
Best Time-of-Use Rate
Niba has cheaper off-peak hours (0.089 €/kWh vs 0.113 €/kWh).
Scorecard Comparison
| Metric (1-10) | HolaLuz | Niba |
|---|---|---|
| Price Competitiveness | 6 | 9 |
| Solar Suitability | 9 | 8 |
| EV Suitability | 6 | 7 |
| Simplicity | 8 | 9 |
| Customer Service | 4 | 8 |
| Transparency | 7 | 9 |
Full Head-to-Head Comparison
HolaLuz
Pros
- Engagemang för 100% grön energi
- Starkt fokus på innovation inom solenergi
- Transparenta månatliga betalningar
- Etisk affärsmodell
Cons
- Fasta avgifter kan bli dyra för de med låg förbrukning
- Svarstiderna hos kundtjänst varierar
- Mycket aggressivt säljfokus på solceller
Available Tariffs
HolaLuz Classic Rate
HolaLuz Rate 3
Niba
Pros
- Med stöd av Iberdrolas infrastruktur och stabilitet
- Mycket konkurrenskraftigt fast pris ({rate})
- Ingen bindningtid
- 100 % grön el-certifikat
- Enkel digital registrering och hantering
Cons
- Kundtjänst är främst digital
- Kortare historik än de stora traditionella elbolagen
Available Tariffs
niba Solar
niba Zen
niba Tres
niba Flex
Find the absolute best supplier for your home
Don't rely on typical profiles. Upload your real bill and our AI will calculate exactly which supplier is cheaper for your actual energy usage.
Analyze My Bill Now