Lucera vs Niba
A detailed head-to-head comparison covering rates, typical bills, pros & cons, and features to help you decide which is better for your home.
Our Verdict
Overall Winner: Lowest Typical Bill
For a typical Spanish household (3.6kW Potencia, 300kWh monthly usage), Lucera is the cheaper option. Their Tarifa Estable de Luz tariff results in an estimated monthly bill of €73.42 (including taxes). This compares to Niba's best option (niba Zen) at €73.49 per month.
* Assumption: 3.6 kW contracted power, 300 kWh monthly usage (20% peak, 30% flat, 50% off-peak), including 21% IVA, 5.11% Electricity Tax, and ~€1 meter rental.
Best Flat Rate
Niba wins here. Their flat rate is 0.123 €/kWh compared to Lucera's 0.125 €/kWh.
Best Time-of-Use Rate
Neither provider currently offers a fixed time-of-use rate.
Scorecard Comparison
| Metric (1-10) | Lucera | Niba |
|---|---|---|
| Price Competitiveness | 9 | 9 |
| Solar Suitability | 6 | 8 |
| EV Suitability | 5 | 7 |
| Simplicity | 9 | 9 |
| Customer Service | 9 | 8 |
| Transparency | 10 | 9 |
Full Head-to-Head Comparison
Lucera
Pros
- Total transparens (ingen marginal på förbrukning)
- 100% certifierad grön energi
- Ingen bindningstid
- Hög kvalitet på app och rådgivning
Cons
- Månadsavgiften gäller oavsett förbrukning
- Prisgarantin är kortare (6 månader) än hos vissa andra
- Huvudsakligen digital support
Available Tariffs
Tarifa Estable de Luz
Niba
Pros
- Med stöd av Iberdrolas infrastruktur och stabilitet
- Mycket konkurrenskraftigt fast pris ({rate})
- Ingen bindningtid
- 100 % grön el-certifikat
- Enkel digital registrering och hantering
Cons
- Kundtjänst är främst digital
- Kortare historik än de stora traditionella elbolagen
Available Tariffs
niba Zen
niba Flex
niba Solar
Find the absolute best supplier for your home
Don't rely on typical profiles. Upload your real bill and our AI will calculate exactly which supplier is cheaper for your actual energy usage.
Analyze My Bill Now