Gana Energía vs HolaLuz
A detailed head-to-head comparison covering rates, typical bills, pros & cons, and features to help you decide which is better for your home.
Our Verdict
Overall Winner: Lowest Typical Bill
For a typical Spanish household (3.6kW Potencia, 300kWh monthly usage), Gana Energía is the cheaper option. Their Gana Energia Tarifa 3 Tramos tariff results in an estimated monthly bill of €66.34 (including taxes). This compares to HolaLuz's best option (HolaLuz Rate 3) at €77.89 per month.
* Assumption: 3.6 kW contracted power, 300 kWh monthly usage (20% peak, 30% flat, 50% off-peak), including 21% IVA, 5.11% Electricity Tax, and ~€1 meter rental.
Best Flat Rate
Gana Energía wins here. Their flat rate is 0.119 €/kWh compared to HolaLuz's 0.147 €/kWh.
Best Time-of-Use Rate
Gana Energía has cheaper off-peak hours (0.08 €/kWh vs 0.113 €/kWh).
Scorecard Comparison
| Metric (1-10) | Gana Energía | HolaLuz |
|---|---|---|
| Price Competitiveness | 9 | 6 |
| Solar Suitability | 7 | 9 |
| EV Suitability | 6 | 6 |
| Simplicity | 9 | 8 |
| Customer Service | 8 | 4 |
| Transparency | 10 | 7 |
Full Head-to-Head Comparison
Gana Energía
Pros
- Prix très compétitifs
- Facturation simple et sans fioritures
- Énergie 100% renouvelable
- Pas de contrats d'engagement
Cons
- Canaux de service client limités
- Pas de bureaux physiques
- Application très basique
Available Tariffs
Gana Energia Tarifa Fija 24h
Gana Energia Tarifa 3 Tramos
HolaLuz
Pros
- Engagement pour une énergie 100% verte
- Accent mis sur l'innovation solaire
- Paiements mensuels transparents
- Modèle d'entreprise éthique
Cons
- Les tarifs forfaitaires peuvent être chers pour les petits consommateurs
- Les temps de réponse du service client varient
- Accent commercial très fort sur le solaire
Available Tariffs
HolaLuz Classic Rate
HolaLuz Rate 3
Find the absolute best supplier for your home
Don't rely on typical profiles. Upload your real bill and our AI will calculate exactly which supplier is cheaper for your actual energy usage.
Analyze My Bill Now