Endesa vs Lucera
A detailed head-to-head comparison covering rates, typical bills, pros & cons, and features to help you decide which is better for your home.
Our Verdict
Overall Winner: Lowest Typical Bill
For a typical Spanish household (3.6kW Potencia, 300kWh monthly usage), Lucera is the cheaper option. Their Tarifa Estable de Luz tariff results in an estimated monthly bill of €73.42 (including taxes). This compares to Endesa's best option (Conecta Luz) at €82.77 per month.
* Assumption: 3.6 kW contracted power, 300 kWh monthly usage (20% peak, 30% flat, 50% off-peak), including 21% IVA, 5.11% Electricity Tax, and ~€1 meter rental.
Best Flat Rate
Lucera wins here. Their flat rate is 0.125 €/kWh compared to Endesa's 0.144433 €/kWh.
Best Time-of-Use Rate
Endesa is the only provider offering a fixed 3-period time-of-use rate.
Scorecard Comparison
| Metric (1-10) | Endesa | Lucera |
|---|---|---|
| Price Competitiveness | 6 | 9 |
| Solar Suitability | 6 | 6 |
| EV Suitability | 6 | 5 |
| Simplicity | 5 | 9 |
| Customer Service | 4 | 9 |
| Transparency | 5 | 10 |
Full Head-to-Head Comparison
Endesa
Pros
- Fysieke kantoren in heel Spanje
- Zeer stabiel bedrijf
- Competitieve digitale tarieven
- Breed scala aan huisdiensten
Cons
- Klantenservice kan traag zijn
- Complexe facturatiestructuur
- Agressieve marketingpraktijken
Available Tariffs
One Luz
Endesa Solar Plus Virtual Battery
One Luz 3 Periodos
Conecta Luz
Lucera
Pros
- Totale transparantie (geen marge op verbruik)
- 100% Gecertificeerde groene energie
- Geen minimale looptijd
- Hoge kwaliteit app en advies
Cons
- Maandelijkse vergoeding geldt ongeacht verbruik
- Prijsgarantie is korter (6 maanden) dan bij sommigen
- Voornamelijk digitale ondersteuning
Available Tariffs
Tarifa Estable de Luz
Find the absolute best supplier for your home
Don't rely on typical profiles. Upload your real bill and our AI will calculate exactly which supplier is cheaper for your actual energy usage.
Analyze My Bill Now