Endesa vs Niba
A detailed head-to-head comparison covering rates, typical bills, pros & cons, and features to help you decide which is better for your home.
Our Verdict
Overall Winner: Lowest Typical Bill
For a typical Spanish household (3.6kW Potencia, 300kWh monthly usage), Niba is the cheaper option. Their niba Zen tariff results in an estimated monthly bill of €73.49 (including taxes). This compares to Endesa's best option (Conecta Luz) at €82.77 per month.
* Assumption: 3.6 kW contracted power, 300 kWh monthly usage (20% peak, 30% flat, 50% off-peak), including 21% IVA, 5.11% Electricity Tax, and ~€1 meter rental.
Best Flat Rate
Niba wins here. Their flat rate is 0.123 €/kWh compared to Endesa's 0.144433 €/kWh.
Best Time-of-Use Rate
Endesa is the only provider offering a fixed 3-period time-of-use rate.
Scorecard Comparison
| Metric (1-10) | Endesa | Niba |
|---|---|---|
| Price Competitiveness | 6 | 9 |
| Solar Suitability | 6 | 8 |
| EV Suitability | 6 | 7 |
| Simplicity | 5 | 9 |
| Customer Service | 4 | 8 |
| Transparency | 5 | 9 |
Full Head-to-Head Comparison
Endesa
Pros
- Fysieke kantoren in heel Spanje
- Zeer stabiel bedrijf
- Competitieve digitale tarieven
- Breed scala aan huisdiensten
Cons
- Klantenservice kan traag zijn
- Complexe facturatiestructuur
- Agressieve marketingpraktijken
Available Tariffs
One Luz
Endesa Solar Plus Virtual Battery
One Luz 3 Periodos
Conecta Luz
Niba
Pros
- Gesteund door de infrastructuur en stabiliteit van Iberdrola
- Zeer concurrerend vast tarief ({rate})
- Geen vaste contractduur / boetevrij overstappen
- 100% groenestroomcertificaten
- Eenvoudige digitale aanmelding en beheer
Cons
- Klantenservice is voornamelijk digitaal gericht
- Kortere geschiedenis in vergelijking met traditionele gevestigde namen
Available Tariffs
niba Zen
niba Flex
niba Solar
Find the absolute best supplier for your home
Don't rely on typical profiles. Upload your real bill and our AI will calculate exactly which supplier is cheaper for your actual energy usage.
Analyze My Bill Now