Nordy vs Niba
A detailed head-to-head comparison covering rates, typical bills, pros & cons, and features to help you decide which is better for your home.
Our Verdict
Overall Winner: Lowest Typical Bill
For a typical Spanish household (3.6kW Potencia, 300kWh monthly usage), Niba is the cheaper option. Their niba Tres tariff results in an estimated monthly bill of €68.67 (including taxes). This compares to Nordy's best option (Tarifa 24h V) at €71.41 per month.
* Assumption: 3.6 kW contracted power, 300 kWh monthly usage (20% peak, 30% flat, 50% off-peak), including 21% IVA, 5.11% Electricity Tax, and ~€1 meter rental.
Best Flat Rate
Niba wins here. Their flat rate is 0.119 €/kWh compared to Nordy's 0.119 €/kWh.
Best Time-of-Use Rate
Niba is the only provider offering a fixed 3-period time-of-use rate.
Scorecard Comparison
| Metric (1-10) | Nordy | Niba |
|---|---|---|
| Price Competitiveness | 8 | 9 |
| Solar Suitability | 6 | 8 |
| EV Suitability | 6 | 7 |
| Simplicity | 9 | 9 |
| Customer Service | 8 | 8 |
| Transparency | 9 | 9 |
Full Head-to-Head Comparison
Nordy
Pros
- Zeer eenvoudige digitale aanmelding
- Transparante beheerkosten
- 100% Groene energie
- Uitstekende Engelstalige ondersteuning
Cons
- Relatief nieuw bedrijf
- Kleiner klantenserviceteam
- Geen fysieke kantoren
Available Tariffs
Tarifa 24h V
Niba
Pros
- Gesteund door de infrastructuur en stabiliteit van Iberdrola
- Zeer concurrerend vast tarief ({rate})
- Geen vaste contractduur / boetevrij overstappen
- 100% groenestroomcertificaten
- Eenvoudige digitale aanmelding en beheer
Cons
- Klantenservice is voornamelijk digitaal gericht
- Kortere geschiedenis in vergelijking met traditionele gevestigde namen
Available Tariffs
niba Solar
niba Zen
niba Tres
niba Flex
Find the absolute best supplier for your home
Don't rely on typical profiles. Upload your real bill and our AI will calculate exactly which supplier is cheaper for your actual energy usage.
Analyze My Bill Now