Plenitude vs Lucera
A detailed head-to-head comparison covering rates, typical bills, pros & cons, and features to help you decide which is better for your home.
Our Verdict
Overall Winner: Lowest Typical Bill
For a typical Spanish household (3.6kW Potencia, 300kWh monthly usage), Plenitude is the cheaper option. Their Fácil Luz tariff results in an estimated monthly bill of €66.18 (including taxes). This compares to Lucera's best option (Tarifa Estable de Luz) at €72.94 per month.
* Assumption: 3.6 kW contracted power, 300 kWh monthly usage (20% peak, 30% flat, 50% off-peak), including 21% IVA, 5.11% Electricity Tax, and ~€1 meter rental.
Best Flat Rate
Plenitude wins here. Their flat rate is 0.097296 €/kWh compared to Lucera's 0.153 €/kWh.
Best Time-of-Use Rate
Neither provider currently offers a fixed time-of-use rate.
Scorecard Comparison
| Metric (1-10) | Plenitude | Lucera |
|---|---|---|
| Price Competitiveness | 8 | 9 |
| Solar Suitability | 7 | 6 |
| EV Suitability | 6 | 5 |
| Simplicity | 8 | 9 |
| Customer Service | 7 | 9 |
| Transparency | 8 | 10 |
Full Head-to-Head Comparison
Plenitude
Pros
- 100 % sertifisert grønn energi
- Enkle og stabile fastpristariffer
- Sterk finansiell ryggrad via Eni
- Uten bindingstid eller exit-gebyrer
Cons
- Tradisjonell kundeservicemodell
- Prisene kan være høyere enn hos lavprisaktører
- Fokus er tungt på fastpris
Available Tariffs
Fácil Luz
Lucera
Pros
- Total gjennomsiktighet (ingen margin på forbruk)
- 100 % sertifisert grønn energi
- Ingen bindingstid
- Høy kvalitet på app og rådgivning
Cons
- Månedsgebyret gjelder uavhengig av forbruk
- Prisgarantien er kortere (6 måneder) enn hos enkelte andre
- Hovedsakelig digital støtte
Available Tariffs
Tarifa Estable de Luz
Find the absolute best supplier for your home
Don't rely on typical profiles. Upload your real bill and our AI will calculate exactly which supplier is cheaper for your actual energy usage.
Analyze My Bill Now