Lucera vs Plenitude
A detailed head-to-head comparison covering rates, typical bills, pros & cons, and features to help you decide which is better for your home.
Our Verdict
Overall Winner: Lowest Typical Bill
For a typical Spanish household (3.6kW Potencia, 300kWh monthly usage), Plenitude is the cheaper option. Their Fácil Luz tariff results in an estimated monthly bill of €66.18 (including taxes). This compares to Lucera's best option (Tarifa Estable de Luz) at €72.94 per month.
* Assumption: 3.6 kW contracted power, 300 kWh monthly usage (20% peak, 30% flat, 50% off-peak), including 21% IVA, 5.11% Electricity Tax, and ~€1 meter rental.
Best Flat Rate
Plenitude wins here. Their flat rate is 0.097296 €/kWh compared to Lucera's 0.153 €/kWh.
Best Time-of-Use Rate
Neither provider currently offers a fixed time-of-use rate.
Scorecard Comparison
| Metric (1-10) | Lucera | Plenitude |
|---|---|---|
| Price Competitiveness | 9 | 8 |
| Solar Suitability | 6 | 7 |
| EV Suitability | 5 | 6 |
| Simplicity | 9 | 8 |
| Customer Service | 9 | 7 |
| Transparency | 10 | 8 |
Full Head-to-Head Comparison
Lucera
Pros
- Total transparens (ingen marginal på förbrukning)
- 100% certifierad grön energi
- Ingen bindningstid
- Hög kvalitet på app och rådgivning
Cons
- Månadsavgiften gäller oavsett förbrukning
- Prisgarantin är kortare (6 månader) än hos vissa andra
- Huvudsakligen digital support
Available Tariffs
Tarifa Estable de Luz
Plenitude
Pros
- 100% certifierad grön energi
- Enkla och stabila fastpristariffer
- Stark finansiell ryggrad via Eni
- Utan bindningstid eller exitavgifter
Cons
- Traditionell kundservicemodell
- Priserna kan vara högre än hos lågprisaktörer
- Fokus ligger tungt på fastpris
Available Tariffs
Fácil Luz
Find the absolute best supplier for your home
Don't rely on typical profiles. Upload your real bill and our AI will calculate exactly which supplier is cheaper for your actual energy usage.
Analyze My Bill Now