Niba vs Plenitude
A detailed head-to-head comparison covering rates, typical bills, pros & cons, and features to help you decide which is better for your home.
Our Verdict
Overall Winner: Lowest Typical Bill
For a typical Spanish household (3.6kW Potencia, 300kWh monthly usage), Niba is the cheaper option. Their niba Tres tariff results in an estimated monthly bill of €68.67 (including taxes). This compares to Plenitude's best option (Plenitude Fácil Plus Luz (≤ 5 kW)) at €70.23 per month.
* Assumption: 3.6 kW contracted power, 300 kWh monthly usage (20% peak, 30% flat, 50% off-peak), including 21% IVA, 5.11% Electricity Tax, and ~€1 meter rental.
Best Flat Rate
Plenitude wins here. Their flat rate is 0.107914 €/kWh compared to Niba's 0.119 €/kWh.
Best Time-of-Use Rate
Niba is the only provider offering a fixed 3-period time-of-use rate.
Scorecard Comparison
| Metric (1-10) | Niba | Plenitude |
|---|---|---|
| Price Competitiveness | 9 | 8 |
| Solar Suitability | 8 | 7 |
| EV Suitability | 7 | 6 |
| Simplicity | 9 | 8 |
| Customer Service | 8 | 7 |
| Transparency | 9 | 8 |
Full Head-to-Head Comparison
Niba
Pros
- Med stöd av Iberdrolas infrastruktur och stabilitet
- Mycket konkurrenskraftigt fast pris ({rate})
- Ingen bindningtid
- 100 % grön el-certifikat
- Enkel digital registrering och hantering
Cons
- Kundtjänst är främst digital
- Kortare historik än de stora traditionella elbolagen
Available Tariffs
niba Solar
niba Zen
niba Tres
niba Flex
Plenitude
Pros
- 100% certifierad grön energi
- Enkla och stabila fastpristariffer
- Stark finansiell ryggrad via Eni
- Utan bindningstid eller exitavgifter
Cons
- Traditionell kundservicemodell
- Priserna kan vara högre än hos lågprisaktörer
- Fokus ligger tungt på fastpris
Available Tariffs
Plenitude Fácil Plus Luz (≤ 5 kW)
Plenitude Fácil Plus Luz (> 5 kW)
Find the absolute best supplier for your home
Don't rely on typical profiles. Upload your real bill and our AI will calculate exactly which supplier is cheaper for your actual energy usage.
Analyze My Bill Now