Proxima vs Niba
A detailed head-to-head comparison covering rates, typical bills, pros & cons, and features to help you decide which is better for your home.
Our Verdict
Overall Winner: Lowest Typical Bill
For a typical Spanish household (3.6kW Potencia, 300kWh monthly usage), Niba is the cheaper option. Their niba Solar tariff results in an estimated monthly bill of €69.88 (including taxes). This compares to Proxima's best option ( Tarifa de luz Variable Cristalina) at €73.43 per month.
* Assumption: 3.6 kW contracted power, 300 kWh monthly usage (20% peak, 30% flat, 50% off-peak), including 21% IVA, 5.11% Electricity Tax, and ~€1 meter rental.
Best Flat Rate
Niba is the only provider offering a true 24-hour flat rate (0.115 €/kWh).
Best Time-of-Use Rate
Niba is the only provider offering a fixed 3-period time-of-use rate.
Full Head-to-Head Comparison
Proxima
Available Tariffs
Tarifa de luz Variable Cristalina
Niba
Pros
- Respaldada por la infraestructura y estabilidad del grupo Iberdrola
- Tarifa fija plana extremadamente competitiva ({rate})
- Sin compromisos de permanencia
- Energía 100% verde certificada
- Contratación y gestión 100% online sencillas
Cons
- Atención al cliente orientada principalmente al canal digital
- Marca joven con menor trayectoria que las comercializadoras tradicionales
Available Tariffs
niba Solar
niba Zen
niba Tres
niba Flex
Find the absolute best supplier for your home
Don't rely on typical profiles. Upload your real bill and our AI will calculate exactly which supplier is cheaper for your actual energy usage.
Analyze My Bill Now