Niba vs Nordy
A detailed head-to-head comparison covering rates, typical bills, pros & cons, and features to help you decide which is better for your home.
Our Verdict
Overall Winner: Lowest Typical Bill
For a typical Spanish household (3.6kW Potencia, 300kWh monthly usage), Nordy is the cheaper option. Their Tarifa 24H VI tariff results in an estimated monthly bill of €72.93 (including taxes). This compares to Niba's best option (niba Zen) at €73.49 per month.
* Assumption: 3.6 kW contracted power, 300 kWh monthly usage (20% peak, 30% flat, 50% off-peak), including 21% IVA, 5.11% Electricity Tax, and ~€1 meter rental.
Best Flat Rate
Niba is the only provider offering a true 24-hour flat rate (0.123 €/kWh).
Best Time-of-Use Rate
Nordy is the only provider offering a fixed 3-period time-of-use rate.
Scorecard Comparison
| Metric (1-10) | Niba | Nordy |
|---|---|---|
| Price Competitiveness | 9 | 8 |
| Solar Suitability | 8 | 6 |
| EV Suitability | 7 | 6 |
| Simplicity | 9 | 9 |
| Customer Service | 8 | 8 |
| Transparency | 9 | 9 |
Full Head-to-Head Comparison
Niba
Pros
- Soutenue par l'infrastructure et la stabilité du groupe Iberdrola
- Tarif fixe plat très compétitif ({rate})
- Sans engagement de durée
- Certificat d'électricité 100% verte
- Souscription et gestion 100% en ligne simples
Cons
- Support client orienté principalement vers le numérique
- Jeune marque avec moins d'ancienneté que les géants historiques
Available Tariffs
niba Zen
niba Flex
niba Solar
Nordy
Pros
- Inscription numérique très simple
- Frais de gestion transparents
- Énergie 100% verte
- Excellent support en anglais
Cons
- Entreprise relativement jeune
- Petite équipe de service client
- Pas de bureaux physiques
Available Tariffs
Tarifa Fija 3P Nordy VI
Tarifa 24H VI
Find the absolute best supplier for your home
Don't rely on typical profiles. Upload your real bill and our AI will calculate exactly which supplier is cheaper for your actual energy usage.
Analyze My Bill Now