Endesa vs Lucera
A detailed head-to-head comparison covering rates, typical bills, pros & cons, and features to help you decide which is better for your home.
Our Verdict
Overall Winner: Lowest Typical Bill
For a typical Spanish household (3.6kW Potencia, 300kWh monthly usage), Lucera is the cheaper option. Their Tarifa Estable de Luz tariff results in an estimated monthly bill of €73.42 (including taxes). This compares to Endesa's best option (Conecta Luz) at €82.77 per month.
* Assumption: 3.6 kW contracted power, 300 kWh monthly usage (20% peak, 30% flat, 50% off-peak), including 21% IVA, 5.11% Electricity Tax, and ~€1 meter rental.
Best Flat Rate
Lucera wins here. Their flat rate is 0.125 €/kWh compared to Endesa's 0.144433 €/kWh.
Best Time-of-Use Rate
Endesa is the only provider offering a fixed 3-period time-of-use rate.
Scorecard Comparison
| Metric (1-10) | Endesa | Lucera |
|---|---|---|
| Price Competitiveness | 6 | 9 |
| Solar Suitability | 6 | 6 |
| EV Suitability | 6 | 5 |
| Simplicity | 5 | 9 |
| Customer Service | 4 | 9 |
| Transparency | 5 | 10 |
Full Head-to-Head Comparison
Endesa
Pros
- Physical offices across Spain
- Very stable company
- Competitive digital-only rates
- Wide range of home services
Cons
- Customer service can be slow
- Complex billing structure
- Aggressive marketing practices
Available Tariffs
One Luz
Endesa Solar Plus Virtual Battery
One Luz 3 Periodos
Conecta Luz
Lucera
Pros
- Total transparency (no margin on consumption)
- 100% Certified renewable energy
- No permanence clauses
- High-quality customer app and advice
Cons
- Monthly service fee applies regardless of consumption
- Price guarantee is shorter (6 months) than some competitors
- Mainly digital-first support
Available Tariffs
Tarifa Estable de Luz
Find the absolute best supplier for your home
Don't rely on typical profiles. Upload your real bill and our AI will calculate exactly which supplier is cheaper for your actual energy usage.
Analyze My Bill Now