Gana Energía vs Lucera
A detailed head-to-head comparison covering rates, typical bills, pros & cons, and features to help you decide which is better for your home.
Our Verdict
Overall Winner: Lowest Typical Bill
For a typical Spanish household (3.6kW Potencia, 300kWh monthly usage), Lucera is the cheaper option. Their Tarifa Estable de Luz tariff results in an estimated monthly bill of €73.42 (including taxes). This compares to Gana Energía's best option (Gana Energia Tarifa 3 Tramos) at €76.63 per month.
* Assumption: 3.6 kW contracted power, 300 kWh monthly usage (20% peak, 30% flat, 50% off-peak), including 21% IVA, 5.11% Electricity Tax, and ~€1 meter rental.
Best Flat Rate
Lucera wins here. Their flat rate is 0.125 €/kWh compared to Gana Energía's 0.139 €/kWh.
Best Time-of-Use Rate
Gana Energía is the only provider offering a fixed 3-period time-of-use rate.
Scorecard Comparison
| Metric (1-10) | Gana Energía | Lucera |
|---|---|---|
| Price Competitiveness | 9 | 9 |
| Solar Suitability | 7 | 6 |
| EV Suitability | 6 | 5 |
| Simplicity | 9 | 9 |
| Customer Service | 8 | 9 |
| Transparency | 10 | 10 |
Full Head-to-Head Comparison
Gana Energía
Pros
- Very competitive pricing
- No-frills simple billing
- 100% Renewable energy
- No permanent contracts
Cons
- Limited customer service channels
- No physical offices
- App is very basic
Available Tariffs
Gana Energia Tarifa Fija 24h
Gana Energia Tarifa 3 Tramos
Lucera
Pros
- Total transparency (no margin on consumption)
- 100% Certified renewable energy
- No permanence clauses
- High-quality customer app and advice
Cons
- Monthly service fee applies regardless of consumption
- Price guarantee is shorter (6 months) than some competitors
- Mainly digital-first support
Available Tariffs
Tarifa Estable de Luz
Find the absolute best supplier for your home
Don't rely on typical profiles. Upload your real bill and our AI will calculate exactly which supplier is cheaper for your actual energy usage.
Analyze My Bill Now