Iberdrola vs Lucera
A detailed head-to-head comparison covering rates, typical bills, pros & cons, and features to help you decide which is better for your home.
Our Verdict
Overall Winner: Lowest Typical Bill
For a typical Spanish household (3.6kW Potencia, 300kWh monthly usage), Iberdrola is the cheaper option. Their Plan Online 3 Periodos tariff results in an estimated monthly bill of €65.22 (including taxes). This compares to Lucera's best option (Tarifa Estable de Luz) at €72.94 per month.
* Assumption: 3.6 kW contracted power, 300 kWh monthly usage (20% peak, 30% flat, 50% off-peak), including 21% IVA, 5.11% Electricity Tax, and ~€1 meter rental.
Best Flat Rate
Iberdrola wins here. Their flat rate is 0.1249 €/kWh compared to Lucera's 0.153 €/kWh.
Best Time-of-Use Rate
Iberdrola is the only provider offering a fixed 3-period time-of-use rate.
Scorecard Comparison
| Metric (1-10) | Iberdrola | Lucera |
|---|---|---|
| Price Competitiveness | 6 | 9 |
| Solar Suitability | 7 | 6 |
| EV Suitability | 7 | 5 |
| Simplicity | 5 | 9 |
| Customer Service | 5 | 9 |
| Transparency | 5 | 10 |
Full Head-to-Head Comparison
Iberdrola
Pros
- Massive investment in renewables
- Top-tier mobile app
- Strong physical presence
- Excellent reliability
Cons
- Standard plans can be expensive
- Occasional billing errors reported
- Large corporate structure
Available Tariffs
Plan Más Ahorro
Plan Online
Plan Estable
Plan Online 3 Periodos
Lucera
Pros
- Total transparency (no margin on consumption)
- 100% Certified renewable energy
- No permanence clauses
- High-quality customer app and advice
Cons
- Monthly service fee applies regardless of consumption
- Price guarantee is shorter (6 months) than some competitors
- Mainly digital-first support
Available Tariffs
Tarifa Estable de Luz
Find the absolute best supplier for your home
Don't rely on typical profiles. Upload your real bill and our AI will calculate exactly which supplier is cheaper for your actual energy usage.
Analyze My Bill Now