Niba vs Nordy
A detailed head-to-head comparison covering rates, typical bills, pros & cons, and features to help you decide which is better for your home.
Our Verdict
Overall Winner: Lowest Typical Bill
For a typical Spanish household (3.6kW Potencia, 300kWh monthly usage), Nordy is the cheaper option. Their Tarifa 24H VI tariff results in an estimated monthly bill of €72.93 (including taxes). This compares to Niba's best option (niba Zen) at €73.49 per month.
* Assumption: 3.6 kW contracted power, 300 kWh monthly usage (20% peak, 30% flat, 50% off-peak), including 21% IVA, 5.11% Electricity Tax, and ~€1 meter rental.
Best Flat Rate
Niba is the only provider offering a true 24-hour flat rate (0.123 €/kWh).
Best Time-of-Use Rate
Nordy is the only provider offering a fixed 3-period time-of-use rate.
Scorecard Comparison
| Metric (1-10) | Niba | Nordy |
|---|---|---|
| Price Competitiveness | 9 | 8 |
| Solar Suitability | 8 | 6 |
| EV Suitability | 7 | 6 |
| Simplicity | 9 | 9 |
| Customer Service | 8 | 8 |
| Transparency | 9 | 9 |
Full Head-to-Head Comparison
Niba
Pros
- Backed by the infrastructure and stability of Iberdrola
- Extremely competitive flat fixed rate ({rate})
- No permanent contract commitments
- 100% green energy certificates
- Easy digital sign-up and management
Cons
- Customer service is primarily digital-focused
- Limited history compared to century-old traditional giants
Available Tariffs
niba Zen
niba Flex
niba Solar
Nordy
Pros
- Very simple digital signup
- Transparent management fees
- 100% Green energy
- Excellent English support
Cons
- Relatively new company
- Smaller customer service team
- No physical offices
Available Tariffs
Tarifa Fija 3P Nordy VI
Tarifa 24H VI
Find the absolute best supplier for your home
Don't rely on typical profiles. Upload your real bill and our AI will calculate exactly which supplier is cheaper for your actual energy usage.
Analyze My Bill Now