Lucera vs Niba
A detailed head-to-head comparison covering rates, typical bills, pros & cons, and features to help you decide which is better for your home.
Our Verdict
Overall Winner: Lowest Typical Bill
For a typical Spanish household (3.6kW Potencia, 300kWh monthly usage), Lucera is the cheaper option. Their Tarifa Estable de Luz tariff results in an estimated monthly bill of €73.42 (including taxes). This compares to Niba's best option (niba Zen) at €73.49 per month.
* Assumption: 3.6 kW contracted power, 300 kWh monthly usage (20% peak, 30% flat, 50% off-peak), including 21% IVA, 5.11% Electricity Tax, and ~€1 meter rental.
Best Flat Rate
Niba wins here. Their flat rate is 0.123 €/kWh compared to Lucera's 0.125 €/kWh.
Best Time-of-Use Rate
Neither provider currently offers a fixed time-of-use rate.
Scorecard Comparison
| Metric (1-10) | Lucera | Niba |
|---|---|---|
| Price Competitiveness | 9 | 9 |
| Solar Suitability | 6 | 8 |
| EV Suitability | 5 | 7 |
| Simplicity | 9 | 9 |
| Customer Service | 9 | 8 |
| Transparency | 10 | 9 |
Full Head-to-Head Comparison
Lucera
Pros
- Total transparency (no margin on consumption)
- 100% Certified renewable energy
- No permanence clauses
- High-quality customer app and advice
Cons
- Monthly service fee applies regardless of consumption
- Price guarantee is shorter (6 months) than some competitors
- Mainly digital-first support
Available Tariffs
Tarifa Estable de Luz
Niba
Pros
- Backed by the infrastructure and stability of Iberdrola
- Extremely competitive flat fixed rate ({rate})
- No permanent contract commitments
- 100% green energy certificates
- Easy digital sign-up and management
Cons
- Customer service is primarily digital-focused
- Limited history compared to century-old traditional giants
Available Tariffs
niba Zen
niba Flex
niba Solar
Find the absolute best supplier for your home
Don't rely on typical profiles. Upload your real bill and our AI will calculate exactly which supplier is cheaper for your actual energy usage.
Analyze My Bill Now