Niba vs Alcanzia
A detailed head-to-head comparison covering rates, typical bills, pros & cons, and features to help you decide which is better for your home.
Our Verdict
Overall Winner: Lowest Typical Bill
For a typical Spanish household (3.6kW Potencia, 300kWh monthly usage), Niba is the cheaper option. Their niba Tres tariff results in an estimated monthly bill of €68.67 (including taxes). This compares to Alcanzia's best option (Alcanzia Tarifa Fija) at €72.73 per month.
* Assumption: 3.6 kW contracted power, 300 kWh monthly usage (20% peak, 30% flat, 50% off-peak), including 21% IVA, 5.11% Electricity Tax, and ~€1 meter rental.
Best Flat Rate
Niba is the only provider offering a true 24-hour flat rate (0.119 €/kWh).
Best Time-of-Use Rate
Niba has cheaper off-peak hours (0.083 €/kWh vs 0.083217 €/kWh).
Scorecard Comparison
| Metric (1-10) | Niba | Alcanzia |
|---|---|---|
| Price Competitiveness | 9 | 8 |
| Solar Suitability | 8 | 8 |
| EV Suitability | 7 | 7 |
| Simplicity | 9 | 9 |
| Customer Service | 8 | 7 |
| Transparency | 9 | 8 |
Full Head-to-Head Comparison
Niba
Pros
- Backed by the infrastructure and stability of Iberdrola
- Extremely competitive flat fixed rate ({rate})
- No permanent contract commitments
- 100% green energy certificates
- Easy digital sign-up and management
Cons
- Customer service is primarily digital-focused
- Limited history compared to century-old traditional giants
Available Tariffs
niba Solar
niba Zen
niba Tres
niba Flex
Alcanzia
Pros
- 100% Certified green energy
- Choice of flat or time-of-use fixed rates
- No permanent stay required (usually)
- Strong solar virtual battery offering
Cons
- Slightly higher power prices than some discount brands
- Focused primarily on digital interaction
- Less known than the major national players
Available Tariffs
Alcanzia Tarifa Fija
Find the absolute best supplier for your home
Don't rely on typical profiles. Upload your real bill and our AI will calculate exactly which supplier is cheaper for your actual energy usage.
Analyze My Bill Now