Niba vs Gana Energía
A detailed head-to-head comparison covering rates, typical bills, pros & cons, and features to help you decide which is better for your home.
Our Verdict
Overall Winner: Lowest Typical Bill
For a typical Spanish household (3.6kW Potencia, 300kWh monthly usage), Gana Energía is the cheaper option. Their Gana Energia Tarifa 3 Tramos tariff results in an estimated monthly bill of €66.34 (including taxes). This compares to Niba's best option (niba Solar) at €69.88 per month.
* Assumption: 3.6 kW contracted power, 300 kWh monthly usage (20% peak, 30% flat, 50% off-peak), including 21% IVA, 5.11% Electricity Tax, and ~€1 meter rental.
Best Flat Rate
Niba wins here. Their flat rate is 0.115 €/kWh compared to Gana Energía's 0.119 €/kWh.
Best Time-of-Use Rate
Gana Energía has cheaper off-peak hours (0.08 €/kWh vs 0.089 €/kWh).
Scorecard Comparison
| Metric (1-10) | Niba | Gana Energía |
|---|---|---|
| Price Competitiveness | 9 | 9 |
| Solar Suitability | 8 | 7 |
| EV Suitability | 7 | 6 |
| Simplicity | 9 | 9 |
| Customer Service | 8 | 8 |
| Transparency | 9 | 10 |
Full Head-to-Head Comparison
Niba
Pros
- Backed by the infrastructure and stability of Iberdrola
- Extremely competitive flat fixed rate ({rate})
- No permanent contract commitments
- 100% green energy certificates
- Easy digital sign-up and management
Cons
- Customer service is primarily digital-focused
- Limited history compared to century-old traditional giants
Available Tariffs
niba Solar
niba Zen
niba Tres
niba Flex
Gana Energía
Pros
- Very competitive pricing
- No-frills simple billing
- 100% Renewable energy
- No permanent contracts
Cons
- Limited customer service channels
- No physical offices
- App is very basic
Available Tariffs
Gana Energia Tarifa Fija 24h
Gana Energia Tarifa 3 Tramos
Find the absolute best supplier for your home
Don't rely on typical profiles. Upload your real bill and our AI will calculate exactly which supplier is cheaper for your actual energy usage.
Analyze My Bill Now