Niba vs Plenitude
A detailed head-to-head comparison covering rates, typical bills, pros & cons, and features to help you decide which is better for your home.
Our Verdict
Overall Winner: Lowest Typical Bill
For a typical Spanish household (3.6kW Potencia, 300kWh monthly usage), Plenitude is the cheaper option. Their Fácil Luz tariff results in an estimated monthly bill of €66.18 (including taxes). This compares to Niba's best option (niba Solar) at €69.88 per month.
* Assumption: 3.6 kW contracted power, 300 kWh monthly usage (20% peak, 30% flat, 50% off-peak), including 21% IVA, 5.11% Electricity Tax, and ~€1 meter rental.
Best Flat Rate
Plenitude wins here. Their flat rate is 0.097296 €/kWh compared to Niba's 0.115 €/kWh.
Best Time-of-Use Rate
Niba is the only provider offering a fixed 3-period time-of-use rate.
Scorecard Comparison
| Metric (1-10) | Niba | Plenitude |
|---|---|---|
| Price Competitiveness | 9 | 8 |
| Solar Suitability | 8 | 7 |
| EV Suitability | 7 | 6 |
| Simplicity | 9 | 8 |
| Customer Service | 8 | 7 |
| Transparency | 9 | 8 |
Full Head-to-Head Comparison
Niba
Pros
- Backed by the infrastructure and stability of Iberdrola
- Extremely competitive flat fixed rate ({rate})
- No permanent contract commitments
- 100% green energy certificates
- Easy digital sign-up and management
Cons
- Customer service is primarily digital-focused
- Limited history compared to century-old traditional giants
Available Tariffs
niba Solar
niba Zen
niba Tres
niba Flex
Plenitude
Pros
- 100% Certified renewable energy
- Simple, stable fixed-price tariffs
- Strong financial backing from Eni
- No permanence or exit fees
Cons
- Traditional customer service model
- Prices can be higher than niche discounters
- Focus is heavily on fixed-rate plans
Available Tariffs
Fácil Luz
Find the absolute best supplier for your home
Don't rely on typical profiles. Upload your real bill and our AI will calculate exactly which supplier is cheaper for your actual energy usage.
Analyze My Bill Now