Octopus Energy vs Lucera
A detailed head-to-head comparison covering rates, typical bills, pros & cons, and features to help you decide which is better for your home.
Our Verdict
Overall Winner: Lowest Typical Bill
For a typical Spanish household (3.6kW Potencia, 300kWh monthly usage), Lucera is the cheaper option. Their Tarifa Estable de Luz tariff results in an estimated monthly bill of €72.94 (including taxes). This compares to Octopus Energy's best option (Octopus 3) at €76.33 per month.
* Assumption: 3.6 kW contracted power, 300 kWh monthly usage (20% peak, 30% flat, 50% off-peak), including 21% IVA, 5.11% Electricity Tax, and ~€1 meter rental.
Best Flat Rate
Octopus Energy wins here. Their flat rate is 0.133 €/kWh compared to Lucera's 0.153 €/kWh.
Best Time-of-Use Rate
Octopus Energy is the only provider offering a fixed 3-period time-of-use rate.
Scorecard Comparison
| Metric (1-10) | Octopus Energy | Lucera |
|---|---|---|
| Price Competitiveness | 8 | 9 |
| Solar Suitability | 10 | 6 |
| EV Suitability | 10 | 5 |
| Simplicity | 9 | 9 |
| Customer Service | 9 | 9 |
| Transparency | 9 | 10 |
Full Head-to-Head Comparison
Octopus Energy
Pros
- Best choice for EV owners
- Excellent solar compensation
- Simple, no-BS billing
- Highly rated app
Cons
- Potencia rates are slightly higher than some peers
- Frequent but small rate adjustments
Available Tariffs
Octopus Solar
Octopus 3
Octopus Go
Octopus Flexi
Octopus Relax
Lucera
Pros
- Total transparency (no margin on consumption)
- 100% Certified renewable energy
- No permanence clauses
- High-quality customer app and advice
Cons
- Monthly service fee applies regardless of consumption
- Price guarantee is shorter (6 months) than some competitors
- Mainly digital-first support
Available Tariffs
Tarifa Estable de Luz
Find the absolute best supplier for your home
Don't rely on typical profiles. Upload your real bill and our AI will calculate exactly which supplier is cheaper for your actual energy usage.
Analyze My Bill Now